Roman Korenic, Psychotherapist in Training and Master of Counselling Student

healing through exploring the symbolic unconscious

An Outlined Approach

Foundations

This is an ongoing journey of unconscious discovery, by which I am seeking to explore not only the unconscious as it relates to my own self, but also how that process helps to uncover unconscious processes in another. The motivation in this approach, therefore, becomes collective healing for both client and therapist.

My ongoing experiences with spiritual exercise, dream journaling, and insight meditation have cultivated a belief that psychological symptoms often carry symbolic meaning, rather than representing mere dysfunction. These beliefs resonate strongly with Carl Jung’s view that the psyche communicates through images and symbols, and that healing emerges from dialogue between conscious awareness and the unconscious.

My work is also influenced by witnessing how relationships shape identity and emotional patterns. These experiences taught me to value the therapeutic relationship as a key site of transformation. I bring a compassionate, reflective presence to my work, supporting clients in exploring emotions, dreams, and inner conflicts without judgment.

My experiential training in depth psychology, and my exposure to a range of cultural and spiritual frameworks through the study and practice of Islam and Buddhism, further reinforce my commitment to honouring each client’s unique cultural and spiritual context. Ultimately, my practice rests on the conviction that individuals possess an innate capacity for growth and that therapy can assist in uncovering hidden strengths, integrating shadow aspects, and restoring a sense of meaning.

CONTEXTS

Jungian psychotherapy’s emphasis on symbol, narrative, and archetype allows it to accommodate a wide range of cultural identities, meaning-making systems, and personal histories. Contemporary scholars highlight how Jungian concepts such as the collective unconscious can be understood in culturally sensitive ways, acknowledging both shared human patterns and unique cultural narratives.

In my practice, I integrate trauma-informed, cultural, and relational perspectives to ensure inclusiveness and responsiveness to clients’ diverse needs. This includes exploring how systemic forces, intergenerational trauma, and social location shape psychological experience. Rather than imposing symbolic interpretations, I collaborate with clients to understand imagery and meaning within their own worldview, to the best of my ability.

Techniques such as dreamwork, somatic and narrative exploration are adapted to each client’s preferences, comfort level, and cultural framework. By blending Jungian depth work with attention to cultural context, I aim to create a therapeutic environment that honours individuality, fosters empowerment, and respects the cultural and existential dimensions of healing.

Assumptions

My underlying assumptions about human nature draw heavily from Jungian analytical psychology and are supported by contemporary depth psychological literature. Jung proposed that humans possess an innate drive toward individuation, a natural movement toward psychological wholeness. I take the view that individuals contain both conscious and unconscious dimensions that influence behaviour, emotions, and relationships.

This includes the shadow, the disowned or unintegrated aspects of the personality, which carries both repressed wounds and untapped potential. I also assume that the psyche is inherently symbolic and self-regulating, often communicating through dreams, somatic experiences, and intuitive insights. From this perspective, symptoms are not failures, but meaningful signals indicating imbalance or unmet psychological needs.

I view individuals as inherently creative, relational, and capable of growth when supported in exploring these inner dynamics. This perspective positions therapy not merely as problem-solving, but as a process of deepening self-awareness, integrating conflicting parts of the self, and restoring coherence between one’s inner and outer life.

PROBLEM DEVELOPMENT

Jungian theory puts forward the notion of psychological problems as emerging when there is significant imbalance or fragmentation within the psyche. Contemporary depth-oriented scholarship emphasizes that problems often arise when individuals become overly identified with the ego while neglecting unconscious needs, instincts, or emotional realities.

Complexes, autonomous emotional patterns shaped by early relational experiences, can become activated later in life, leading to anxiety, depression, relational difficulties, or behaviour that feels outside one’s control. Literature on trauma and attachment further supports the idea that unresolved experiences shape unconscious expectations of the self and others. When symbolic expression is blocked, individuals may experience psychological stagnation or crises of meaning.

Jungian scholars have also noted that the psyche attempts to compensate for imbalance, often through dreams, symptoms, or emotional turbulence. From this perspective, human problems develop not simply from pathology but from disconnection. This can manifest as disconnection from one’s instincts, creativity, relationships, or a deeper sense of purpose. Therapy thus seeks to restore relationship with the unconscious and re-establish psychological equilibrium.

Theory of Change

The model’s theory of change is grounded in Jung’s belief that transformation arises from the integration of unconscious material into conscious awareness. Contemporary depth psychology literature highlights that therapeutic change occurs when clients develop a reflective relationship with their inner world, allowing for new meanings, emotional insight, and behavioural flexibility.

Jungian methods such as dream analysis, symbolism, and shadow work provide structured pathways for engaging unconscious imagery, while relational and attachment-oriented perspectives emphasize the healing power of attuned connection.

Change is also supported by the compensatory function of the psyche, which naturally seeks balance when given space for reflection. As clients become more aware of inner conflicts, shadow aspects, and recurring patterns, they gain the capacity to respond consciously rather than react unconsciously. This enhances self-regulation, emotional integration, and authenticity. Ultimately, change is understood as a collaborative process in which the therapist provides containment, interpretation, and relational safety, while the client engages in exploration, meaning-making, and conscious choice.

IntegratiON IN THEORY

Psychotherapy outcome research consistently highlights the centrality of the therapeutic relationship, client agency, and therapist responsiveness, all factors closely aligned with Jungian practice. Meta-analyses emphasize that common factors such as empathy, alliance, and collaboration account for significantly more variance in outcomes than specific techniques. This supports my own emphasis on attunement, relational depth, and co-constructed meaning-making.

Research also shows that therapy is most effective when interventions align with client preferences and cultural context, which reinforces my integrative and flexible approach to depth-oriented work. Jungian therapy’s attention to imagery, narrative, and meaning resonates with findings that emotional processing and narrative coherence promote long-term change.

These findings further validate outcome-informed practices, which feature regular check-ins about progress and allow for the possibility of adjusting interventions to support client goals. By grounding my depth-oriented practice in contemporary outcome research, I ensure that the work is not only symbolically, rich but also empirically attuned and client-centered.

INTEGRATION IN PRACTICE

My integrative stance reflects an assimilative integration model, in which Jungian analytical psychology provides the theoretical home base, while techniques from other approaches are incorporated to enhance flexibility and responsiveness.

I draw from relational psychodynamics for understanding attachment and transference, humanistic approaches for fostering unconditional positive regard, and trauma-informed modalities for grounding emotional experience. This aligns with modern integrative literature emphasizing that effective therapy blends theory-driven coherence with responsive adaptation.

I also incorporate common-factors principles—such as alliance building, empathy, and collaborative goal setting—given their strong empirical support. Somatic awareness, mindfulness, and narrative techniques are used when they help clients engage more fully with unconscious material or regulate overwhelming emotions. This integrative approach allows me to maintain the depth and symbolic richness of Jungian work while ensuring that therapy remains accessible, culturally attuned, and grounded in contemporary clinical understanding. My goal is to honour the complexity of the psyche by drawing on multiple streams of knowledge, while remaining rooted in a coherent depth-psychological framework.